Has Adventure Tourism Gone Too Far?

Travelled by Dan Roberts on 1 May 2009 | 4 Comments

Has Adventure Tourism Gone Too Far?

Queenstown in New Zealand, Bariloche in Argentina, Interlaken in Switzerland and Cairns in Australia all pride themselves as world adventure tourism meccas.  But unfortunately none of them are without serious injuries or death to paying customers in the last few years.   The recent spate of adventure tourism related accidents in Queenstown alone (six serious injuries including at least 3 deaths in the last 12 months) and the death of two travellers on Fraser Island Australia last week has got me thinking - has adventure tourism gone too far?

Climbing carries its own inherent risks

Climbing carries its own inherent risks

As we as humans seek more and more adrenalised activities are we putting too much trust into the hands of profit driven adventure tourism operators?

I remember my first Bungy jump and I remember standing on the Kawarau Bridge (the spiritual home of Bungy) thinking this is completely safe as this is these guys business - they could not afford to kill me - they would lose their business.  In a strange way that was probably quite true all those 20 years ago when adventure tourism was just a fledgling industry.

I say probably with tongue in check when I also think about a bit of an episode I had (in the same week I believe) with the new sport of para-gliding.  As paying customers we were taken 3/4 of the way up the Crown Range by one instructor and shown how to open the parachute and run like Hussain Bolt down the hill where our paraglider would fill with air lifting as gently off the ground before cliffs edge and into the guidance of the instructor way below who waved his paddles bringing us gently down after a joyous 5 minute flight.  I, however, on a beautiful calm windless Central Otago day, proceeded, through a complete lack of any ability to run fast, ran straight off the cliff with a collapsed paraglider plummeting a number of meters before the parachute miraculously caught the air arresting my fall to certain death.  Was I in Shock?  Not really.

The complete lack of training meant that I was blissfully unaware of the extent to which I had risked my life - my mate Tim on the ground however regaled the full story to me as he explained the explosion of panicked shouting between the instructors over the walkie talkies (They don’t do solo paragliding flights for beginners now-a-days).

Hanging over the jump site.  Photo care of AJ Hackett Bungy NZ

Hanging over the jump site. Photo care of AJ Hackett Bungy NZ

If I had been injured or died in either of these adventures it seems inevitable the government regulation would have intervened in those very early adventure tourism days more than likely making the high stake adventure tourism industry that we know today less likely.  Today, it seems that the risk is just accepted as part and parcel of the product.  Tourism is big business and adventure tourism is a big money industry.  These adrenaline activities are not cheap, yet travellers of all types seem to be able to fit them into their budgets.  Sure there have been improvements in rules and regulations and safety standards but the continual pursuit to push the envelope just that little bit higher means that there are continually new activities being invented that are not covered by such laws.  Bungy in contrast is a relatively safe sport.

A case in point being the very popular activity of river surfing in New Zealand - that is, going down grade 3+ white water rivers on nothing but a body board - was completely devoid of any industry wide standards until a young English backpacker drowned early in 2008.

Equally, more adventure tourism operators means more competitive pressures on businesses.  You can Bungy all over the world for example.  Operators are sometimes pushed to operate on days that are marginal weather wise.  I heard of a sky-diving operation recently putting customers into the Remarkables Mountains because they were operating above safe wind strengths.

I guess though at the end of the day the question is, do we as travellers really waant rules and regulations pacifying all the risk and hence the adventure away?  My answer would be certainly not.  Except that when I pay to climb Everest I kind of half expect to die; but when I pay for a jet-boat ride, a canyon swing, or a heli-bike do I have the same expectations, or are most travellers as blissfully ignorant as I was on that first Bungy?


Comments

  • Dan says:

    Sorta weird reading this because I don't really consider that stuff adventure tourism. Maybe it is though because it is all tour, guided type stuff purely for quick bouts of adrenaline. Nothing against adrenaline, I love it, or the way people pay to find it. I guess I prefer adventure travel, a motorcycle ride across the Himalaya or Kayaking in Alaska sounds more like an adventure to me. Semantics I guess.

    People make their own choices though and much of the west goes so over the top with safety it kills the experience, doing this stuff in less regulated places is like stepping back to those good old days your parents talk of where people were held responsible for their decisions and didn't pass the buck onto someone else in the hope of a nice cash payout.

    1 year ago

  • Sam Clark says:

    Yes - from my perspective - I know for a fact you must be very careful about adventure tourism in Sri Lanka and Laos as the safety record of some of the operators is appalling while there are excellent companies too. From the opposite perspective, I found the Sydney Bridge climb one of the most boring experiences of my life - beign effectively taught for an hour how to climb a ladder. We amused ourselves while climbing the actual bridge (at the very slow designated speed) with a debate as to whether it would be technically possible to kill yourselves and we came to the conclusion that it was not. Unsure if all adventure tourism needs to be regulated to that extend!

    1 year ago

  • xebidy says:

    In some ways I think that might be the problem Luke - you just don't expect to die in supposedly mature tourism economies such as New Zealand or Australia so you put all your trust in the operator without actually thinking about the inherent risks.

    Certainly if I was to go canyoning or Bungy Jumping in Africa I would really think about it and do my research.

    1 year ago

  • Luke Ford says:

    Great article Dan. I think in a place like NZ or OZ you can feel fairly safe and the 'death' factor probably doesn't jump out at you. But what about places like Laos, Albania, Zambia... you really have to do your research and ensure the operator has plenty of experience. I did hear an experience of someone in Slovenia, a well developed country with safety regulations in place, but the rapids were on that particular day a bit rougher and unfortunately the kid never made it out. So yeah i guess it's that thrill that has people going back for more.

    1 year ago

  • You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login now.

TrackBacks

No TrackBacks have been submitted for this page.

Trackback URL for this page.

Featured Travellers

Craig and Linda

Craig and Linda present the Indie Travel Podcast - sweet travel advice for independent travellers - each Friday

Craig and Linda have been travelling the world for three years now and we love them because they use Travel Generation to plan and schedule all their travels. Follow their itineraries here.